Subject Deals In Ascertaining Sale of Property †Free Samples

Question: What Is The Deals In Ascertaining Sale Of Property? Answer: Introducation The current subject arrangements in determining whether offer of property will be held assessable under segment 6-5 of the ITAA 1997 (Robin Barkoczy 2016). As clear Smith and Jones are associated with the exercises of business that identifies with the property improvement. Moreover, they likewise utilize the square of land for touching sheep. It is comprehended from the contextual analysis that business experienced misfortune which them to partition the land and sell it. Laws: Underneath recorded are the accompanying laws that are considered in the setting to the current contextual investigation which are as per the following; FC of T v St Huberts Island Pty Limited 78; Segment 995-1 of the ITAA 1997; Tax assessment administering 92/3 Segment 25 (1) of the ITAA 1997; Ferguson v FC of T (1979); Application: As held under division 70 of the ITAA 1997, selling of property will be viewed as the part of business that is connected with improvement and such properties are viewed as exchanging stock (Barkoczy, 2016). Area 995-1 of ITAA depicts business as a calling or exchange of acquiring benefit. The present issues that has climbed in this setting is to find out the exercises of business is related with property improvement. On surveying the present circumstance, it is comprehended that the partitioned square of land can't be viewed as land, which was at first procured to convey exchanging stock. It merits referencing that Smith and Jones didn't acclimatized land to exchange it. To execute the exercises of sheep brushing Smith and Jones at first procured the land, anyway on causing misfortune they chose to partition the land into squares so they could acquire benefit. The salary earned from the exercises of business must be treated as separated exchanges and such exchanges will be incorporated for appraisal as normal pay characterized under segment 6-5 of the ITAA 1997 (Braithwaite and Braithwaite, 2016). Presenting to Para 6 of the tax assessment decisions 92/3 income got from confined exchange is treated as customary salary given that the citizen initially expected to offer the land so as to get benefit from the conventional course of business. As held under FC of T v St Huberts Island Pty Limited 78 land can be treated as a segment of exchanging stock given the land was procured with the expectation of selling it once more (Morgan et al., 2016). It is necessary to possess the reason for acquiring benefit at the hour of getting capital resource. After survey the idea of business, the partitioned square of land can be considered as stock. On surveying the current contextual analysis, it is built up that citizen essential goal was sheep brushing and they improved the land for that equivalent reason. End: Meaning to tax collection decisions of 92/3 it is seen that business of selling area will be considered for appraisal under the heads of Isolated Transaction. The measure of profit, which is produced from these exchanges, will be held for evaluation as standard salary under segment 6-5 of the ITAA 1997. Reference List: Barkoczy, S., 2016. Establishments of Taxation Law 2016.OUP Catalog. Braithwaite, V. what's more, Braithwaite, J., 2016. Overseeing tax assessment consistence: The development of the ATO Compliance Model. Morgan, A., Mortimer, C. what's more, Pinto, D., 2016. A down to earth prologue to Australian tax collection law 2016. Robin BarkoczyWoellner (Stephen Murphy, Shirley Et Al), 2016.Australian Taxation Law 2016. Oxford University Press.

Existentialism - Essay Topics

Existentialism - Essay Topics On the off chance that you are considering existentialism and have a test coming up, the most ideal approach to get ready for it is to compose bunches of training essays.â Doing this encourages you to review the writings and the thoughts you have contemplated; it causes you to sort out your insight into these; and it regularly triggers unique or basic bits of knowledge of your own.â Here are a lot of exposition addresses you can use.â They identify with the accompanying exemplary existentialist writings:  Tolstoy, My Confession Tolstoy, The Death of Ivan Ilyich Dostoyevsky, Notes from Underground Dostoyevsky, The Grand Inquisitor Nietzsche, The Gay Science Beckett, Waiting for Godot Sartre, The Wall Sartre, Nausea Sartre, Existentialism as a Humanism Sartre, â€Å"Portrait of an Anti-Semite† Kafka, A Message from the Emperor, A Little Fable, Couriers, Before the Law Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus Camus The Stranger  Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky Both Tolstoys Confession and Dostoyevskys Notes from Underground appear to dismiss science and rationalistic philosophy.â Why?â Explain and assess the explanations behind the basic perspectives toward science in these two writings.  Both Tolstoy’s Ivan Ilyich (in any event once he falls wiped out) and Dostoyevsky’sâ Underground Man feel alienated from the individuals around them.â Why?â In what ways is the sort of confinement they experience comparable, and in what ways is it extraordinary?  The underground man says that ‘to be too cognizant is an illness.’â What does he mean?â What are his reasons?â In what ways does the underground man experience the ill effects of over the top consciousness?â Do you consider this to be the main driver of his sufferings or are there more profound issues that offer ascent to it?â Does Ivan Ilyich likewise experience the ill effects of exorbitant awareness, or is his concern something else?  Both The Death of Ivan Ilyich and Notes From Underground depict people who feel isolated from their society.â Is the disconnection they experience avoidable, or is it basically brought about by the kind of society they have a place with.  In the Authors Note toward the start of Notes from Underground, the creator depicts the underground man as illustrative of another sort of individual that must definitely show up in current society.â What parts of the character are illustrative of this new kind of present day individual?â Does he stay delegate today in 21st century America, or has his sort pretty much vanished?  Complexity what Dostoyevsky’s Grand Inquisitor says about opportunity with what the Underground Man says about it.â Whose perspectives do you most concur with?  Nietzsche, The Gay Science Tolstoy (in Confession), Dostoyevsky’s Underground Man, and Nietzsche in The Gay Science, are for the most part condemning of the individuals who figure the principle objective in life ought to be the quest for delight and the shirking of pain.â Why?â  When Nietzsche read Notes from Underground he promptly hailed Dostoyevsky as a ’kindred spirit’.â Why?  In The Gay Science, Nietzsche says: â€Å"Life-that is: being remorseless and relentless against every little thing about us that is developing old and weak†¦.being without worship for the individuals who are biting the dust, who are pitiful, who are antiquated.   Explain, giving illustrative models, what you think he means and why he says this.â Do you concur with him?  Toward the start of Book IV of The Gay Science, Nietzsche says with everything taken into account and all in all: some time or another I want just to be a Yes-sayer.â Explain what he implies and what he is restricting himself toby reference to issues he examines somewhere else in the work.â How fruitful would he say he is in keeping up this invigorating position?  Profound quality is group sense in the individual.â What does Nietzsche mean by this?â How does this announcement fit in with the manner in which he sees regular ethical quality and his ownâ elective qualities?  Clarify in detail Nietzsche’s perspective on Christianity.â What parts of Western human progress, both positive and negative, does he see as generally because of its impact?  In The Gay Science Nietzsche says: â€Å"The most grounded and most wickedness spirits have so far done the most to progress humanity.†Ã¢ Explain, giving models, what you think he means and why he says this.â Do you concur with him?  In The Gay Science Nietzsche appears to both condemn moralists who doubt the interests and senses and furthermore himself be an extraordinary supporter of self-control.â Can these two parts of his reasoning be reconciled?â If things being what they are, how?  What is Nietzsche’s disposition in The Gay Science towards the mission for truth and information? Is it something brave and splendid, or would it be advisable for it to be seen with doubt as a headache from conventional ethical quality and religion?  Sartre Sartre broadly saw that man is sentenced to be free.â â He likewise composed that man is a pointless passion.â Explain what these announcements mean and the thinking that lies behind them.â Would you portray the origination of mankind that rises as hopeful or critical?  Sartre’s existentialism was named by one pundit â€Å"the theory of the graveyard,† and existentialism strikes numerous as ruled by discouraging thoughts and outlooks.â Why might somebody think this?â And for what reason may others disagree?â In Sartre’s figuring which inclinations do you see as discouraging and which elevating or rousing?  In his Portrait of the counter Semite, Sartre says the counter Semite feels the sentimentality of impermeability.â What does this mean?â How can it assist us with understanding enemy of Semitism?â Where else in Sartres compositions is this propensity analyzed?  The peak of Sartres epic Nausea is Roquentins disclosure in the recreation center when he contemplates.â â What is the idea of this revelation?â Should it be depicted as a type of illumination?  Clarify and talk about either Anny’s thoughts regarding ‘perfect moments’ or Roquentin’s thoughts regarding ‘adventures (or both).â How do these ideas identify with the significant topics investigated in Nausea?  It has been said that Nausea presents the world as it appears to one who encounters at a profound level what Nietzsche depicted as the demise of God.â What bolsters this interpretation?â Do you concur with it?  Clarify what Sartre implies when he says that we settle on our choices and play out our activities in anguish, relinquishment and despair.â Do you discover his explanations behind review human activity along these lines convincing?â [In responding to this inquiry, ensure you consider Sartrean messages past simply his talk Existentialism and Humanism]  At a certain point in Nausea, Roquentin says, â€Å"Beware of literature!†Ã¢ What does he mean? For what reason does he say this?  Kafka, Camus, Beckett Kafkas stories and illustrations have frequently adulated for catching certain parts of the human condition in the cutting edge age.â concerning the anecdotes we talked about in class, clarify which highlights of innovation Kafka enlightens and what bits of knowledge, assuming any, he brings to the table.  Toward the finish of ‘The Myth of Sisyphus’ Camus says that ‘one must envision Sisyphus happy’?â Why does he say this?â Wherein lies Sisyphus’ happiness?â Does Camus’ end follow sensibly from the remainder of the essay?â How conceivable do you discover this end?  Is Meursault. the hero of The Stranger,â an case of what Camus brings in ‘The Myth of Sisyphus’ a ‘absurd hero’?â Justify your answer with close reference to both the novel and the article.  Beckett’s play Waiting for Godot, is-clearly about waiting.â But Vladimir and Estragon hold up in various manner and with various attitudes.â How do their methods of standing by express various potential reactions to their circumstance and, by suggestion, to what Beckett sees as the human condition?  Existentialism when all is said in done ‘The significant thing isn't to be relieved however to live with one’s ailments’ (Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus).â Discuss this announcement concerning in any event three of the accompanying works:â  â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â The Myth of Sisyphus  â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â The Gay Science  â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â  Notes from Underground  â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â  Nausea  â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â Waiting for Godot Do the works being referred to show, support, or censure the viewpoint communicated in Camus statement?â  From Tolstoys record of his self-destructive misery in his Confession to Becketts Waiting for Godot, there is much in existentialist composing that appears to offer a depressing perspective on the human condition.â based on the writings you have examined, okay say that existentialism is in reality, a distressing way of thinking, too much worried about mortality and meaninglessness?â Or does it have a positive angle moreover?  As indicated by William Barrett ex

The Institution of Marriage in Oscar Wilde’s “The Importance of Being Earnest” and Susan Glaspell’s “Trifles” - Literature Essay Samples

Oscar Wilde vigorously attacks the institution of heterosexual marriage in his play â€Å"The Importance of Being Earnest† by employing light comedy in order to portray characters that are shallow, immature, and oblivious about the commitment into which they are about to enter. Marriage is also harshly critiqued in Susan Glaspell’s play â€Å"Trifles,† a play that explores the hardships that women must face within the institution of marriage and the tragedy that befalls one woman pushed past her breaking point. Both plays are harshly critical of the institution of marriage, one through light satirical comedy and the other through a tragic story about a failed marriage. However, the somber impact of the more realistic story within â€Å"Trifles† provides a more harsh understanding of the institution of marriage than does the comedy, which its audience can easily laugh off. In Wilde’s â€Å"The Importance of Being Earnest† the characters treat marriage as something frivolous. What they do treat as important are esoteric social norms, connotations of names, and trivial details. Cecily and Gwendolyn only want to marry Algernon and Jack because they believe that their names are Ernest. As Gwendolyn says to Jack early in the play, â€Å"†¦My ideal has always been to love some one of the name of Ernest. There is something in that name that inspires absolute confidence. The moment Algernon first mentioned to me that he had a friend called Ernest, I knew I was destined to love you† (10). In another part of the play, Cecily meets Algernon for the first time and believes he is Jack’s brother Ernest. She confesses her love for him and tells him all about how they’ve been engaged; she bought a ring for herself in his name, and wrote herself love letters pretending they were from him (32). The women base their love entirely on the belief that the men are named Ernest, which reveals their naivety regarding ma rriage. The frivolity with which these women fall in love suggests that relationships, too, are frivolous.Jack and Algernon diminish the institution of marriage in another way. During an early conversation about marriage proposals, Algernon says: â€Å"I really don’t see anything romantic in proposing. It is very romantic to be in love. But there is nothing romantic about a definite proposal. Why, one may be accepted. One usually is I believe. Then the excitement is all over. The very essence of romance is uncertainty. If I ever get married, I’ll certainly try to forget the fact† (3). This dialogue indicates that Algernon believes commitment is something that ruins romance and perhaps, by extension, love – hardly a resounding endorsement of marriage.Lady Bracknell’s idea of marriage is equally cynical. When Gwendolyn and Jack tell her they are engaged, Lady Bracknell tells Gwendolyn that â€Å"An engagement should come to a young girl as a surpris e, pleasant or unpleasant as the case may be. It is hardly a matter that she should be allowed to arrange for herself†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (12). She then interrogates Jack about his upbringing, property, and family to learn whether he is suitable for her daughter and society. Lady Bracknell does not see love in marriage; rather, marriage is an institution that must sustain wealth and social class. Although Wilde’s play offers a very negative view of the institution of marriage, it does so in a lighthearted way. The characters are laughably extreme in their behaviors, and so Wilde’s criticism of marriage can be laughed off. Susan Glaspell’s play â€Å"Trifles† takes the opposite approach. Although it is not primarily about marriage, it does deal with the negative effects of marriage on women. The play is a tragic story about how Mrs. Wright may have murdered her husband. The emotional impact of the play forces its audience to take its subject matter seriously. Un like â€Å"The Importance of Being Earnest,† â€Å"Trifles† isn’t directly about marriage – the topic of marriage is subtly hinted at by devices in the dialogue and setting rather than overtly flaunted by the characters’ mannerisms. The audience learns about Mrs. Wright as they see Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale going through her house, recognize the symbolism of Mrs. Wright’s things, and hear the comments the men make to the women in the play. When the party first arrives at the house, the pans under the sink are unwashed, there’s a loaf of bread sitting out, and things around the house are unfinished. The disorder of Mrs. Wright’s housework seems to indicate disorder in her life. When Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters are looking at her quilt Mrs. Hale observes, â€Å"Here, this is the one she was working on, and look at the sewing! All the rest of it has been so nice and even. And look at this! It’s all over the place! Why, it lo oks as if she didn’t know what she was on about!†(1679). Mrs. Hale starts to pull it out and re-stitch it and then she asks, â€Å"What do you suppose she was so nervous about?† The implication there is that something was happening in that moment when her stitching faltered – maybe that her husband was being verbally abusive or aggressive at that time. Also, the women find a broken birdcage and Mrs. Wright’s dead bird in her sewing basket. The bird’s neck had been wrung, and Mrs. Hale believes that Mr. Wright did it. The bird was beloved by Mrs. Wright – Mrs. Hale deduces that she was going to bury it in the â€Å"pretty box† they found it in (1681). If Mr. Wright did indeed wring the bird’s neck, it could be an indication of abuse. The bird can be considered a symbol of Mrs. Wright herself; indeed, Mrs. Hale refers to her as a â€Å"songbird† early in the play. Mr. Wright’s murder of the bird thus suggests suffocation of Mrs. Wright socially and mentally as well. The bird’s murder motivates Mrs. Wright to kill her husband and confirms that their marriage was a failed one. The dialogue between the women also helps us paint a portrait of the kind of marriage Mr. and Mrs. Wright had, and also of their own understandings of the difficulties of marriage for women in that place and time. Mrs. Hale describes Mr. Wright as having been a â€Å"hard man† (1680) she tells the court attorney that she hasn’t been over Mrs. Wright’s house in a year because it â€Å"never seemed a very cheerful place† and that â€Å"†¦I don’t think a place’d be any cheerfuller for John Wright’s being in it† (1676). She also expresses guilt for not coming over to see Mrs. Wright because it was so un-cheerful in the house. She expresses her empathy for the way Mrs. Wright must have felt: â€Å"I might have known she needed help! I know how things ca n be – for women. I tell you, it’s queer, Mrs. Peters. We live close together and we live far apart. We all go through the same things – it’s all just a different kind of the same thing† (1682). Mrs. Peters expresses similar sentiments when they discover Mrs. Wright’s dead bird. She talks about when her first baby died, and how she â€Å"knows what stillness is† (1682). Through this dialogue, we learn of the serious trials of marriage that women had to endure – the problems are true to life and utterly believable, and the dialogue has a heavy emotional impact. Its somber tone, realistic subject matter, heavy symbolism and believable characters make â€Å"Trifles† a more scathing indictment of marriage than â€Å"The Importance of Being Earnest.† The heavy emotional impact left by the former is more likely to leave an audience thinking about the problems in marriage than will a light-hearted comedy about a group of young, petty people who have very naà ¯ve ideas about what marriage should be. â€Å"Trifles† is harsher for another reason – it deals with blunt reality of married life rather than just making fun of the kind of people who get married. Wilde’s frivolous characters might cause one to laugh at marriage, but Glaspell’s force an audience to really consider the institution and its potential costs.

The Ultimate Weapon - 1079 Words

â€Å"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure..† –Movie Coach Carter This quote directly relates to our worlds power over nuclear weapons. The fear in this debate is not that we do not have a weapon strong enough, but we have a weapon that is unrivaled by any other. There is only one thing nuclear weapons have been used for it is the very reason they were created. Because of there killing power it was only natural they were made for war. Nuclear weapons are a too powerful of a weapon for anyone, or any country to have access to. Safety protocols make it impossible for nuclear weapons to be harmful when not fired. Wrong! The problems with nuclear weapons start even before†¦show more content†¦The Nuclear Weapons are not bad. It is the people who use them that are the real evil! The Nuclear weapon is just a tool (Rethinking). This is partly true, but we live in a world where not everyone ha s the same morals. There are corrupt and bad people in powerful positions in the world. To some people firing a nuclear weapon for their personal gain is the easy thing to do. But if the person did not have access to them, then the problem would never arise. But unfortunately there are 9 countries in the world with at least 10 nuclear weapons. This world rarely faces a problem that has the potential to kill off humanity. But Nuclear weapons have this potential. There are currently 17,000, known bombs (How). If for some reason, whether if it were WW3 or something else, if the world fired all these off strategically at big cities, easily over half of the world’s population would be killed off almost instantly. And the pandemonium wouldn’t stop there. Governments would collapse and without rule the survivors would soon be on their own. The spread of soot would be so drastic it would change climates, and drastically speed up global warming (Jha). The radiation fr om the bombs explosion would be in higher concentration and would slowly diffuse across continents to areas of low radiation. This would cause dead zones where most animals, humans being one,Show MoreRelatedAssault Weapons Essay768 Words   |  4 PagesThere are many views about gun control especially about assault weapons. People are both for it and against it. The people who are for the ban believes the weapons can only be used for violence. They don’t want to recognize that people against the ban have several different reasons to own their guns. These reasons can vary; some people just want protection; others want to use their guns for sport. This pleasurable pastime will also provide a variety of food to supplement family grocery suppliesRead MoreEssay about The Rise Of The Nuclear Weapon Into A Political Weapon1368 Words   |  6 Pages During last 50 years of development, the nuclear bomb, as the ultimate weapon became the peacekeeping force on the earth. The n uclear bomb was developed in Manhattan project during the WW II and was successfully tested in the New Mexico on July 16 1945. At this point started the change of nuclear weapon from ultimate weapon to political weapon. USA decided to use the atomic bomb to defeat Japan in order to save around 500.000 lives of American soldiers that were needed to end the war and in theRead MoreTheme Of Archetypes In Sir Gawain And The Green Knight864 Words   |  4 Pagesthrough the archetypal quest within three key archetypes—the magic weapon, the boon, and the unhealable wound in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. There’s always some kind of magical element that helps the hero during their journey. The magical weapon that is presented in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, is the green girdle. Sir Gawain obtains the magic weapon to help him with his journey to the center of the abyss. This magical weapon sets the theme of the relationship that Sir Gawain has with theRead MoreA Modern Day Cold War1280 Words   |  6 PagesDaisaku Ikeda, a spiritual leader for Japan once commented, ‘Japan learned from the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that tragedy wrought by nuclear weapons must never be repeated and that humanity and nuclear weapons cannot coexist.’ The world has experienced the bombings of Japan, of Pearl Harbor and the conflict of the Cold War, but even with these conflicts present in our history, warning us of the effects, these meaning have not carried through into society today. Currently in the Middle EastRead MoreFailure of Liberalism in Dr. Strangelove898 Words   |  4 Pagesof the American public views on liberalism in America. In spite of the prevailing view of democracy as â€Å"good† and communism as â€Å"evil† at the time, America was being just as evil as the Soviet Union by pursuing the technology of superior nuclear weapons. Dr. Strangelove takes a serious look at how liberalism ultimately failed the international system in a most horrific way. Liberalism maintains that human nature is basically good, and that bad human behavior is usually a product of insufficientRead MoreThe Middle East1388 Words   |  6 Pagesheld by the U.S. and Israel when considering the possibility of Iranian nuclear weapons. However, the attitudes of the Obama administration in discussing potential deals with Iran have demonstrated a change in the U.S. strategy when interacting with an Iranian regime that desires nuclear capability. In recent months, Iran has made global headlines once again by asking for permission to develop and possess nuclear weapons within their state for the purpose of stabilizing the turbulent Middle East. ThisRead MoreThe Rise Of Nuclear Weapons1665 Words   |  7 Pages‘The Rise of Nuclear Weaponry in the Middle East’ Daisaku Ikeda, a spiritual leader in Japan once commented, ‘Japan learned from the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that tragedy wrought by nuclear weapons must never be repeated and that humanity and nuclear weapons cannot coexist.’ The world has experienced the bombings of Japan, of Pearl Harbor and the conflict of the Cold War, but even with these conflicts present in our history, warning us of the effects of conflict and nuclear weaponry coexistingRead MoreWorld Peace and Nuclear Powers860 Words   |  4 PagesWorld Peace and Nuclear Weapons By Naseer Ahmad Virk This article deals with one of the most debatable discussions of all time. Read on to know more about nuclear weapons pros and cons. Nuclear weapons have been in this world since World War 2 and have been used, till date only twice and that too in the same war we are speaking about. The only country to use nuclear weapons was the United States of America. The US dropped two atomic nuclear bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and NagasakiRead MoreVirtual Reality: Computer Generated Simulation1029 Words   |  5 PagesVirtual reality has existed in many forms since the late 1960s. The concept of virtual reality started with Ivan Sutherland and his ultimate display in 1965. The ultimate display was a paper Sutherland wrote before the development of the personal desktop regarding the combination of computers to the design, construction, navigation and habitation of virtual worlds. The ultimate display would, of course, be a room within which the computer can control the existence of matter...With appropriate programmingRead MoreGuns, Germs And Steel By Jared Diamond1402 Words   |  6 Pagesand why they are mor e powerful. Instead of proximate causes that get straight to the point, he takes a different route that leads to ultimate causes. Ultimate causes go deeper in information and include many details unlike proximate causes. He does this and ultimately bothers with ultimate causes because proximate causes are common and shallow explanations. Ultimate causes trace things back to the very beginning, the origin, and allows us to deeply understand why the world is as it is today. It helps

Communicating value Example

Essays on Communicating value Article Running Head: Communicating Value Communicating Value Inserts His/her Communicating Value The dynamics of marketing have changed greatly after the introduction of internet and other high tech communication technologies. Conventional marketing techniques are being replaced by a personalized approach as companies try to speak to consumers personally. The plethora of information available to consumers is making them more aware of the products and services offered by different companies. Internet has made consumers stronger and this is why companies have to develop a personalized approach in their marketing. Online forums and Facebook groups have already allowed consumers to voice their opinions (or concerns). Also study suggests that a significantly large number of broadband users had their purchase decision influenced by an online source (Riegner, 2007). This means a lot for marketers as now they have to use more resources to cater to the individualized needs of the people. Individual marketing mix is now based on information that previous didn’t existed. A person can go read a review and that review may influence his or her purchase decision. Now for marketers this is something new and they have to adapt to this going trend. Companies have to start internet campaigns and should attempt to establish a relationship with the consumers. Imagine product managers or brand manager of a brand answering queries of consumers personally†¦ This is the approach that is required in today’s world of interactive media called the internet. Product development will also change forever because consumer insight is so easy to access. This gives an added advantage to managers as now they can develop products that are better suited for consumers. It is easy and quick to know what consumers want and change the product accordingly. This has changed the product development process. Mass advertisement, on a large scale, is not needed in today’s era because different consumers have different needs. Companies cannot rely on mass advertisements now a day because they are too general. Specificity is required because of vast difference in individual marketing mix variables. Commercial implications of this new marketing strategy are costly because internet advertisement is not cheap. Also interactive forums should be established and managed and this will take time as well as resources. Companies cannot just end its mass advertisement marketing strategy because not all consumers are using internet today. Firms will have to carefully allocate resources to both mass advertisements and interactive marketing in order to gain maximum advantage. Mass advertisement is still needed because one on one marketing strategies are expensive to a great extent. People are also getting bored of conventional advertisement like emails and telemarketing (Nunes Merrihue, 2007).There exist a market that is not responding to such advertisement appeals and for them mass advertisement is required. One technique is to use places that people visit often and cannot avoid at all. Mass advertisements should be used to communicate to ‘busy’ consumers. Word of mouth information should be used to market alongside with mass advertisement in order to achieve the best results. Broadband is being used by many consumers but not all of them can be targeted using personalized approach. For different consumers different marketing techniques will be required. References Nunes Merrihue. (2007). Continuing Power of Mass Advertising. MIT Sloan Management Review   Riegner, Cate. (2007). Word of Mouth on the Web: The Impact of Web 2.0 on Consumer Purchase Decisions. Journal of Advertising Research, 47, 436-447

Free Agents Versus Structure for Structuration -myassignmenthelp

Question: Write about theFree Agents Versus Structurefor Structuration Theory. Answer: Introduction If human motivations were constant and universal, and if the opportunity structure were entirely a product of human interaction, then all variation in human action would be determined by social structures(Powell, 2014). The relationship between a society and individual is a twisted one. Individuals are what together make the society and the society in turn is what shapes the individuals. There have been a number of debates and theories as to whether human beings are autonomous individual bodies, making one's own laws and exhibiting their own free will, or whether it is the society that gives individuals a personality, a way of life, structure. However, the fact that a society is what is actually made up of individual personalities is what brings the twist. It is like a never ending loop. Many sociologists have put forth their point of views, explaining why they think whether the case is the former or the latter. Different Views As mentioned above, there have been a number of debates and discussions and writers penning down their personal thoughts as to why their theories are better or more correct. Over the years, both sociologists and anthropologists have been captivated by the debate; correspondingly, they have developed a myriad of theoretical perspectives which seek to address these concerns(Mellinger, 2012). Most discussions can be divided into 3 categories, the one that show structure to be more dominant, the others that feel that it is the free will of individuals that collectively shapes the society and the third that conclude that both the agency and structure are by products of each other set in a continuous loop. Below are a few of the most famous personalities who have been pioneers in their fields and have done their fair share of research regarding this debate. Pierre Bordeaux- One of the most famous theories given by the very famous Bordeaux was that of habitus. He explains in his book called the Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste the relationship between an individual and society. He compares it almost to a set up where an individual is an agent who is set up in a field where the society acts as what would define the individual depending upon his actions. He believes that the more an agent comprehends his or her role in the society or "field", the more he becomes accustomed to certain relationships as well as expectations. These later on take the shape of an individual's personality and become his habits, thus using the word habitus. Instead of saying it one way or the other, Pierre actually came to the conclusion of discovering a new found relationship between an individual and the society. Berger and Luckmann- Berger and Luckmann were other famous personalities, who were of the opinion that the relationship between the society and an individual is dialectic, inter dependent and a continuous, never ending loop. They coined the phrase social construction of reality and explain it as a theory which says that a human beings social interaction with other human as well as his life experience are what form the basis of how the individual presents himself or herself to the society. Anthony Giddens- Anthony is another sociologist who has moved away from the debate of agency versus structure. He believes that structure is in fact a medium as well as an outcome. He believes that society and agents are two separate entities that happen to be mutually constitutive of one another. Anthony developed the structuration theory which acknowledges the interaction of meaning, standards and values, and power and posits a dynamic relationship between these different facets of society(Gibbs, 2017). Conclusion From the above discussion, it is quite clear that the debate between agency and structure is a complex study in addition to being a very demanding tour of different theoretical perspectives on organizations(Luckman, 2008). It is a complicated study. What is real depends on how individuals perceive as and how it gets perceived collectively by a society. While some people have been of the opinion that society is more dominant in shaping the nature, habits and personalities of individuals and society is what renders the lives of human beings with structure, others oppose this theory. Many people have been firm believers of the fact that human beings are autonomous and free agents. It is the human beings that collectively form the society and not the other way round. Therefore, it can be concluded that social relationships are densely intertwined with reasons, emotion, commitments, beliefs, and attitudes -- the aspects of consciousness that make up agency and action(Little, 2011). References Gibbs, B. J. (2017, july Beverley J. Gibbs). Structuration theory. Retrieved september 23, 2017, from ENCYCLOPDIA BRITANNICA: https://www.britannica.com/topic/structuration-theory Hamson, N. (2015, april 2). Fredrik Barth: An intellectual biography. Retrieved september 20, 2017, from The Pluto Press Blog Independent, radical publishing: https://plutopress.wordpress.com/2015/04/01/fredrik-barth-an-intellectual-biography/ Little, D. (2011, march 19). New ideas about structure and agency. Retrieved september 24, 2017, from Understanding Society: https://understandingsociety.blogspot.in/2011/03/new-ideas-about-structure-and-agency.html Luckman, P. L. (2008). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. The British Journal of Social Work , 823824. Mellinger, W. M. (2012, march 14). Understanding the Structure and the Agency Debate in the Social Sciences. Retrieved september 24, 2017, from Doing Modernity: Using Critical Interactionism to Study Everyday Life: https://doingmodernity.blogspot.in/2012/03/understanding-structure-and-agency.html Powell, C. (2014, march 14). Structure and Agency. Retrieved september 23, 2017, from The Practical Theorist: https://practicaltheorist.wordpress.com/2014/05/24/structure-and-agency/

Russia Essays - Superpowers, Aid, Humanitarian Aid, Poverty, Russia

Russia Tristan Yapuncich Period 3 4/20/00 Position Paper Russia Position Paper: The Plan The main problem in Russia is lack of a non-corrupt government. It is impossible to run any country, poor or rich, crime or no crime, healthcare or no healthcare, economy or no economy, without some sort of government. Russia needs assistance in the form of socialist diplomatic support, advice, and very carefully monitored loans. There is no question of producing a Marshall Plan for Russia of the sort that the United States pioneered after World War II, but Russia needs to make that plan, and the U.S. needs to let Russia know that plan will be supported. Although the conditions in Russia differ significantly from the post-war Europe, this struggling nation needs a similar plan to restore it's economy, government, and human rights. Russia is in a desperate state of despair, suffering from poverty, crime, and disease, and needs aid from the U.S. It is also in the interest of the U.S. to provide this aid, as long as the aid is targeted at areas that would best boost Russia's terrible st atistics, and turn Russia into a successful trading partner. Poverty is a huge problem facing Russia. In a country with such long traditions of statistical manipulation and hostility to the inquiries of the state, it is not easy to pin down the true extent of poverty in Russia. But there is little doubt that the picture is looking increasingly bleak. United Nations figures suggest that the purchasing power of average income in the USSR in 1987 was about $6,000 or 32 per cent of the level of the US (Andrew, POVERTY: Bleak future for the poor). By 1996, it was just $4,531 in adjusted terms, or 17 per cent of the US level (Andrew, POVERTY: Bleak future for the poor). Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, there has been both growing inequality and a jump in absolute poverty. That is up from 11 per cent in 1994 (Andrew, POVERTY: Bleak future for the poor). Faced with such bleak figures, some observers argue that the figures are simply false. There is little doubt that data collection is plagued with difficulties, and there are fierce debates abou t methodology. There are problems that exaggerate, and others which artificially underplay, the true state of Russia's population. But as Tatiana Khokhlova of the Russian European Centre for Economic Policy in Moscow argues: It is very difficult to talk about the absolute level of poverty, but you can analyse the trends. And those trends are distinctly pessimistic. Government figures often show what citizens are entitled to receive rather than what they do receive. In 1997, just 20 per cent of income that Russians were entitled to under federal laws was actually paid (Andrew, POVERTY: Bleak future for the poor). Since then, arrears on the payment of wages and social benefits have increased sharply. Pensions are on average paid with a delay of one month at present, and wages are 2.5 months behind (Andrew, POVERTY: Bleak future for the poor). Equally, there is little doubt that Russians conceal the true extent of their income from official surveys as part of a broader strategy of tax avoidance. A recent World Bank study found that most people admitted to spending twice what they claimed to earn. Other research suggested that undeclared informal income had rocketed in the past few years to an average of 42 per cent of total household earnings (Andrew, POVERTY: Bleak future for the poor). If poverty is a problem, naturally health care, crime, and other issues become concerns. Russia has a declining life expectancy, increasing birth mortality, and increasing crime rate. Russia's population is likely to dip under 146 million by the year 2000 and drop to 141 million by 2010, according to a new government forecast. The report by the State Statistics Committee also projects that Russia's dismally low life expectancy figures won't rise in the decade ahead, Interfax news agency said. Based on the most likely of four demographic estimates compiled by the committee, the average life span in 2005 will be 65 years -- the same as in 1996 (Andrew, POVERTY: Bleak future for the poor). Russia's population, which has been in decline since